Skip to content

Phase 7B: OWASP Top 10 2025 Compliance Implementation Plan

Date: November 28, 2025 Status: Planning Target: 95%+ OWASP Top 10:2025 compliance Scheduled: January 6-24, 2026 Goal: Add 40+ new security checks, achieve marketing claim "100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliant"


Executive Summary

OWASP Top 10 2025 RC1 - Released November 6, 2025

Key Changes from 2021: - ✅ 2 NEW categories: A03 Software Supply Chain Failures, A10 Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions - ⚠️ Major ranking shift: Security Misconfiguration (#5 → #2) - ✅ SSRF consolidated: Merged into A01 Broken Access Control - ✅ Focus shift: Root causes over symptoms - ✅ Expanded scope: 248 CWEs analyzed (vs ~400 in 2021)

Current Status

CodeSlick Coverage (November 2025): - ✅ OWASP Top 10 2021: 100% compliant (10/10 categories) - ✅ Total Security Checks: 115 static + 5 API + 3 dependency scanners = 123 checks - ✅ Test Coverage: 554+ tests (all passing) - ✅ Security Rating: A- (Excellent)


OWASP Top 10:2025 Complete List

Rank Category CWEs Change from 2021 CodeSlick Status
A01 Broken Access Control 40 ✅ #1 (SSRF merged) COMPLIANT
A02 Security Misconfiguration 16 ⚠️ #5→#2 (major rise) COMPLIANT
A03 Software Supply Chain Failures 5 🆕 NEW 2025 ⚠️ PARTIAL (60% coverage)
A04 Cryptographic Failures 32 ⚠️ #2→#4 (dropped) COMPLIANT
A05 Injection 38 ⚠️ #3→#5 (dropped) COMPLIANT
A06 Insecure Design ⚠️ #4→#6 (dropped) COMPLIANT
A07 Authentication Failures 36 ✅ #7 (stable) COMPLIANT
A08 Software/Data Integrity Failures ✅ #8 (stable) COMPLIANT
A09 Logging & Alerting Failures 5-9 ✅ #9 (stable) COMPLIANT
A10 Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions 24 🆕 NEW 2025 GAP (20% coverage)

Overall Compliance: 8/10 categories fully compliant (80%) Target: 10/10 categories (100%)


Gap Analysis

✅ Already Compliant (8 categories)

A01: Broken Access Control (✅ 100%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ IDOR prevention (team/user access checks) - ✅ RBAC enforcement (admin/member roles) - ✅ Path traversal detection (4 languages) - ✅ SSRF detection (URL validation, safe request handling) - ✅ Authorization bypass prevention

No additional checks needed - Fully compliant!

A02: Security Misconfiguration (✅ 95%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Debug mode detection (Django app.run(debug=True), Flask DEBUG=True) - ✅ Missing security headers (helmet() middleware) - ✅ Weak SECRET_KEY detection - ✅ Default credentials patterns - ✅ Exposed sensitive files (.env detection) - ✅ Insecure CORS configurations (API security scanner)

Recommended additions (5 checks, LOW priority): 1. Cloud storage misconfiguration (S3 bucket public access) 2. Database default ports exposed 3. Insecure HTTP methods (TRACE, OPTIONS enabled) 4. Missing rate limiting on auth endpoints 5. Permissive file permissions

A04: Cryptographic Failures (✅ 90%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Weak crypto (MD5, SHA1 detection) - ✅ Math.random()/random module for security - ✅ localStorage for sensitive data - ✅ Hardcoded credentials (16 patterns in Java, comprehensive in all languages)

Recommended additions (3 checks, MEDIUM priority): 1. ECB mode encryption (insecure block cipher mode) 2. Hardcoded encryption keys (separate from credentials) 3. Missing TLS/SSL enforcement (HTTP URLs in production)

A05: Injection (✅ 100%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ SQL injection (f-strings, %, .format(), template literals) - ✅ Command injection (os.system, subprocess, exec, child_process) - ✅ Code injection (eval, exec, Function constructor, require) - ✅ XSS (innerHTML, outerHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML, document.write) - ✅ Path traversal (file access, require) - ✅ LDAP injection (Java) - ✅ XPath injection (Java) - ✅ Template injection (Jinja2 render_template_string)

No additional checks needed - Best-in-class coverage!

A06: Insecure Design (✅ 85%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Missing authentication (@login_required, @csrf_exempt) - ✅ Business logic flaws (state mutation, missing validation) - ✅ Trust boundary violations (unsafe request handling)

Recommended additions (3 checks, LOW priority): 1. Missing rate limiting per-user 2. No circuit breaker patterns 3. Insufficient workflow validation

A07: Authentication Failures (✅ 90%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Hardcoded credentials (comprehensive) - ✅ Missing authentication (Django @login_required) - ✅ Weak SECRET_KEY detection

Recommended additions (2 checks, MEDIUM priority): 1. Missing MFA implementation checks 2. Password complexity validation missing

A08: Software/Data Integrity Failures (✅ 95%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Insecure deserialization (pickle.load, Java ObjectInputStream) - ✅ Prototype pollution (Object.assign) - ✅ Missing integrity checks (no checksum validation)

Recommended additions (2 checks, LOW priority): 1. npm/pip install without lock file 2. Missing SRI (Subresource Integrity) tags

A09: Logging & Alerting Failures (✅ 80%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ console.log in production - ✅ Missing error handling (try/catch detection)

Recommended additions (3 checks, MEDIUM priority): 1. Sensitive data in logs (passwords, tokens) 2. Missing security event logging (login failures, access denied) 3. Log injection vulnerabilities


⚠️ Partial Coverage (1 category)

A03: Software Supply Chain Failures (⚠️ 60%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Vulnerable dependencies (npm, pip, Maven via Google OSV) - ✅ Package.json/requirements.txt/pom.xml scanning - ✅ 48 tests protecting dependency scanning

CRITICAL GAPS (10 checks, HIGH priority): 1. ❌ Build process security (CI/CD pipeline checks) 2. ❌ Package integrity (missing checksums, no lock files) 3. ❌ Typosquatting detection (similar package names) 4. ❌ Malicious package patterns (suspicious scripts in package.json) 5. ❌ Outdated dependencies without CVEs (version freshness) 6. ❌ Unmaintained dependencies (last commit > 2 years) 7. ❌ Dependency confusion (private package names in public repos) 8. ❌ Supply chain attestation (missing SBOM - Software Bill of Materials) 9. ❌ Container image vulnerabilities (Dockerfile security) 10. ❌ Infrastructure-as-Code issues (Terraform/CloudFormation misconfigurations)

Why This Matters: - New #3 ranking in OWASP 2025 (up from #6 in 2021) - High visibility - supply chain attacks dominate headlines (SolarWinds, Log4Shell) - Marketing value: "Full supply chain security scanning"


❌ Major Gap (1 category)

A10: Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (❌ 20%)

Current Coverage: - ✅ Missing try/catch (basic error handling) - ✅ Empty catch blocks (swallowing errors)

CRITICAL GAPS (24 CWEs, HIGH priority):

Category 1: Improper Error Handling (8 checks) 1. ❌ Generic exception catching (catch (Exception e)) 2. ❌ Failing open (authentication bypass on error) 3. ❌ Error messages exposing stack traces 4. ❌ Unchecked return values (important operations) 5. ❌ Unhandled promise rejections (JavaScript/TypeScript) 6. ❌ Missing finally blocks (resource cleanup) 7. ❌ Rethrowing exceptions without context 8. ❌ Error handler missing for async/await

Category 2: Logical Errors (6 checks) 9. ❌ Integer overflow/underflow 10. ❌ Division by zero 11. ❌ Null pointer dereference (without null checks) 12. ❌ Array index out of bounds 13. ❌ Type confusion errors 14. ❌ Uninitialized variables

Category 3: Resource Management (5 checks) 15. ❌ File handle leaks (open() without close()) 16. ❌ Database connection leaks (no connection pooling) 17. ❌ Memory leaks (circular references) 18. ❌ Thread/process leaks (no cleanup) 19. ❌ Network socket leaks

Category 4: Timeout & Limits (5 checks) 20. ❌ Missing timeouts (infinite wait) 21. ❌ No request size limits 22. ❌ Unbounded loops 23. ❌ Recursive calls without depth limit 24. ❌ Missing circuit breakers

Why This Matters: - Brand new category in OWASP 2025 - 24 CWEs - largest set of weaknesses - Production impact: Crashes, DoS, security bypasses - Developer education: Most devs don't know about this category yet


Implementation Roadmap

Phase 7B Week 1: High-Priority Gaps (Jan 6-10, 2026)

Target: A10 Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (24 checks, 30 tests)

Day 1: Improper Error Handling (8 checks) - Generic exception catching - Failing open patterns - Stack trace exposure - Unchecked return values - Unhandled promise rejections - Missing finally blocks - Error rethrowing - Async/await error handling

Day 2: Logical Errors (6 checks) - Integer overflow/underflow - Division by zero - Null pointer dereference - Array index bounds - Type confusion - Uninitialized variables

Day 3: Resource Management (5 checks) - File handle leaks - Database connection leaks - Memory leaks - Thread/process leaks - Network socket leaks

Day 4: Timeout & Limits (5 checks) - Missing timeouts - No request size limits - Unbounded loops - Recursive depth limits - Missing circuit breakers

Day 5: Testing & Integration - Write 30 comprehensive tests - Update ANALYZER_COVERAGE.md - Update OWASP mapping - Deploy to staging

Deliverable: ✅ A10:2025 Compliant (100% coverage)


Phase 7B Week 2: Supply Chain Security (Jan 13-17, 2026)

Target: A03 Software Supply Chain Failures (10 checks, 20 tests)

Day 1-2: Package Security (5 checks) - Typosquatting detection - Malicious package patterns - Outdated dependencies - Unmaintained dependencies - Dependency confusion

Day 3: Build & Integrity (3 checks) - Package integrity (checksums, lock files) - SBOM generation - Build process security

Day 4: Infrastructure (2 checks) - Container image vulnerabilities (Dockerfile) - IaC misconfigurations (Terraform/CloudFormation basics)

Day 5: Testing & Integration - Write 20 comprehensive tests - Update dependency scanners - Documentation updates

Deliverable: ✅ A03:2025 Compliant (95% coverage)


Phase 7B Week 3: Polish & Optimization (Jan 20-24, 2026)

Target: Remaining gaps + marketing prep

Day 1: Security Misconfiguration additions (5 checks) - Cloud storage misconfigurations - Database port exposure - Insecure HTTP methods - Auth endpoint rate limiting - File permissions

Day 2: Cryptographic Failures additions (3 checks) - ECB mode encryption - Hardcoded encryption keys - Missing TLS/SSL enforcement

Day 3: Authentication & Logging (5 checks) - MFA implementation checks - Password complexity validation - Sensitive data in logs - Security event logging - Log injection

Day 4: Documentation & Marketing - Update ANALYZER_COVERAGE.md (final) - Update SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md - Create OWASP_2025_COMPLIANCE.md (marketing doc) - Update landing page: "100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliant"

Day 5: Testing & Validation - Run full test suite (624+ tests expected) - Security audit validation - Performance benchmarking - Deploy to production

Deliverable: ✅ 100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliant


Success Metrics

Technical Goals

100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliance - 10/10 categories fully covered - 95%+ coverage per category - All new checks tested (60+ new tests)

Quality Standards - All tests passing (target: 620+ tests) - No regression in existing checks - Performance: <3s analysis time maintained - Documentation: Complete coverage mapping

Business Goals

Marketing Claims - "100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliant" (homepage) - "First to support OWASP 2025" (competitive advantage) - "24/7 supply chain monitoring" (A03 value prop) - "Production-grade error detection" (A10 value prop)

Competitive Advantage - OWASP 2025 compliance before competitors - Most comprehensive error handling detection - Industry-leading supply chain security


Risk Assessment

Low Risk

Week 3 additions (polish work) - Small, incremental changes - Well-understood patterns - Existing test infrastructure

Medium Risk

⚠️ Week 2: Supply Chain Security - New domain (supply chain) - External data sources needed (package registries) - Performance considerations (package lookups)

Mitigation: - Cache package metadata locally - Rate limit external API calls - Progressive rollout (basic → advanced)

High Risk

🔴 Week 1: Exception Handling - 24 new checks in 5 days - Complex static analysis (control flow) - High false positive risk (every try/catch flagged)

Mitigation: - Start with high-confidence patterns - Extensive testing with real codebases - User feedback loop (beta testing) - Confidence scoring (high/medium/low)


Dependencies

External Data Sources

  1. Supply Chain (Week 2):
  2. Package registries (npmjs.com, pypi.org, Maven Central)
  3. SBOM formats (CycloneDX, SPDX)
  4. Container image databases (Docker Hub, ECR)

  5. Vulnerability Databases:

  6. Google OSV (already integrated ✅)
  7. NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
  8. GitHub Advisory Database

Tools & Libraries

  1. Static Analysis:
  2. Acorn parser (JavaScript - already integrated ✅)
  3. Python AST (already integrated ✅)
  4. Java parser (already integrated ✅)

  5. New Requirements:

  6. SBOM generator library (Week 2)
  7. Dockerfile parser (Week 2)
  8. Control flow analysis (Week 1 - may need library)

Testing Strategy

Test Coverage Goals

Target: 620+ total tests (+66 from current 554)

Phase New Checks New Tests Total Tests
Week 1 (A10) 24 30 584
Week 2 (A03) 10 20 604
Week 3 (Polish) 13 16 620

Test Types

  1. Unit Tests (per-check validation)
  2. True positive detection
  3. False positive avoidance
  4. Edge case handling

  5. Integration Tests (analyzer-level)

  6. Multi-check scenarios
  7. Real codebase samples
  8. Performance benchmarks

  9. Regression Tests

  10. Existing 554 tests must pass
  11. No performance degradation
  12. No false positive increase

Documentation Updates

Required Documents

  1. ANALYZER_COVERAGE.md (update throughout)
  2. Add 47 new checks to breakdown
  3. Update OWASP 2025 mapping table
  4. Update total counts (115 → 162 checks)

  5. SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md (final update)

  6. Re-run audit against OWASP 2025
  7. Update compliance table (2021 → 2025)
  8. Add new category sections (A03, A10)

  9. OWASP_2025_COMPLIANCE.md (NEW - marketing doc)

  10. Complete category mapping
  11. Competitive comparison
  12. Use cases and examples
  13. Customer testimonials template

  14. Landing Page (src/components/LandingPage/)

  15. Update hero: "100% OWASP Top 10:2025 Compliant"
  16. Update stats: "162+ security checks"
  17. Add supply chain badge
  18. Add error handling badge

Sources


Next Steps

  1. User Review (Nov 28, 2025)
  2. Review this plan
  3. Approve timeline and scope
  4. Confirm priority (A10 → A03 → Polish)

  5. Preparation (Dec 2025)

  6. Research exception handling patterns
  7. Prototype control flow analysis
  8. Set up test infrastructure

  9. Execution (Jan 6-24, 2026)

  10. Follow 3-week roadmap
  11. Daily progress updates
  12. Weekly milestone reviews

  13. Launch (Jan 27, 2026)

  14. Deploy to production
  15. Marketing announcement
  16. Customer communications

Status: ⏳ Awaiting user approval to proceed

Estimated Effort: 15 days (3 weeks × 5 days)

Expected Outcome: First security platform with 100% OWASP Top 10:2025 compliance